![]() It’s an absolute triumph - just what the Tower of London has always been - a Royal, fortified cross between Bodyworlds and Psycho. The hand may or may not be attached to a body: the frosted glass gives nothing away. Its fingers, like those of a heavy smoker, have acquired the colour of lightly grilled toast. It seems poised to crawl, as if it might clutch at your throat at any second. It’s a skeletal hand, just visible behind cloudy glass in the wall of the gate. Look for the missing stone on your left as you pass through the Byward Tower. Margaret of Anjou: Queen of England, She-wolf of F.Not when it comes to a certain object within the Tower’s entrance.Top Five Causes of the Wars of the Roses.Oh, Brother: Edward, George and Richard.Henry Stafford, Second Duke of Buckingham.Deformity and Performance in "Richard III".About the Playwright: William Shakespeare.Protestants Versus Catholics: Religion in Elizabet.“Those Other Guys” in Richard III: Who Supported W.York’s Matriarch: Cecily Neville, Duchess of York.Ten Facts About Life in Shakespeare’s England.“Bones in the Tower: A Discussion of Time, Place and Circumstance.” Part 2. However, this was discredited in the 1950s, and it remains uncertain whether these are The Bones or not. ![]() Although an examination of the “bones of 1674” found them to be appropriate matches for the two princes and believed the deaths to have occurred in 1483, making it impossible to have been the work of Henry VII. To complicate matters, in 1674, a chest was uncovered buried beneath the White Tower containing two child skeletons supposed to be the princes’ remains. It has even been suggested that the princes actually died of disease, such as the plague, while in confinement. The alternative defended by modern-day Ricardian supporters is that Henry Tudor had the princes killed in order to stabilize his own claim to the throne, which also explains why the blame would have been ascribed to Richard III as an integral piece of Tudor propaganda. First, it has been claimed that Buckingham himself killed the princes, since he would have had access to the Tower at the time. While it is most widely accepted that Richard III was responsible for the deaths of the princes, there are several other highly plausible scenarios. The Murder of the Princes in the Tower, James Northcote, 1785 Apparently, Richard then had them re-buried in an unknown location. With the help of Miles Forest, “a fellow fleshed in murder before time,” and John Dighton, “a big, broad, square, strong knave,” Tyrell had the princes smothered to death at midnight and then buried at the foot of one of the Tower’s staircases (214). More claims that after Brackenbury refused to do the murders himself, Richard employed his ambitious servant Tyrell and placed the princes in the care of “Black Will or Will Slaughter” instead of their usual keepers. Since this confession has never actually surfaced, it is impossible to know whether More invented it or not. The only detailed written version of the deaths of the two princes comes from Sir Thomas More’s History of King Richard III, in which he relates a confession supposedly given by James Tyrell, the alleged murderer, upon his trial for treason in 1502. ![]() ![]() It is at this point in the story where the facts become obscured. John Everett Millais' "The Two Princes Edward and Richard in the Tower, 1483," 1878.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |